Wednesday, September 6, 2017


My podcast audio of post: above. Text: next. 

(Audio Clip, Karena Rosario 911 call - Sec. 3, below).


1 -- September 7th... marks five years moving to six.

Five years will have passed since Faith Hedgepeth was slain in her roommate’s bedroom in Chapel Hill on a Friday morning.

Arrests: none. Justice, not done. 

A murderer and possible accomplices free…free to kill someone else, too. They’ve shown how far they are willing to go.

Faith Danielle Hedgepeth. Alive in so many hearts. 

Five years later.

One word invariably dominates: unsolved. 

As of now. 

There has been an exhaustive and devoted investigation, but when it comes to answers…resolution — there is silence. 

Silence haunts this case since Faith expired. 

Leading up to the 7th, I was able to gain access to some law enforcement insight and records that illuminate the investigative journey.

The Chapel Hill police, SBI, Durham District Attorney’s office, and  FBI have all worked on and analyzed many or perhaps all aspects of Faith’s case. 

Some answers I never got - that’s the nature of the beast. Some things too sensitive to say - only the murderer would know…some leads still pressing.

It makes sense to think the murderer reads this blog. And: if others are linked to Faith's homicide, I suspect they do, too. They follow the case here and elsewhere. 

They can’t stay away.

It’s not really a complete secret who did this, and who else may have been involved or knows the details. It’s not a secret to them. 

First things first. Long ago, years ago - an FBI profile said this murder was personal.

Still, when you talk to more than 2000 people in an investigation, and do DNA testing on what I’ve now learned is over 750 people, you’re not just dealing with those who had a personal relationship with (or thought they did)…or emotions for Faith.

Investigators have cast a wide, wide net. Well into worlds of people who never had a thing to do with Faith Hedgepeth before her murder. 

After doing that, the net had narrowed.

I’ll call a law enforcement person I spoke to at some length…“S” for source. One exchange went like this.

Gaspo: So there are two roads to take here: one, it could be anybody. Anybody..and you have no idea. Or: it’s someone one or two steps removed from the wide circle of people who knew Faith.

Which is it? Which road have you taken…the one you are on now.

S: “I don’t believe this was a random crime.”

S has seen all the evidence. S doesn’t talk about theories without evidence. S said: “I don’t believe this was a random crime.”

Sure, many or most have thought this. But I can’t recall a key figure in the case coming out and saying it.

So, someone just outside Faith’s circles killed her? Maybe one step removed. Maybe two or three.

Good chance this person didn’t know Faith or investigators would know who it was. They don’t.

So, if true: where did the fierce and frenetic emotion in this murder come from? The killer, perhaps not known to Faith…but Faith known to him?

You could also deduce that it emanated from the person or persons involved somehow(actual witnesses, conspirators, associates) — who did know Faith. 

What fueled such anger? Find that, you find the killer.

2 --

And that note on a Time Out bag left on the bed near Faith’s body…with lots of blood in that room - but not a lot of blood on the note. You’d have expected more unless it was written at a time separate from the brutality. 

The killer’s DNA was on the note, though.


G: In what substance was that DNA found? Touch DNA?

S: “I’m not going to go into detail on that.”

G: Why?

S: “I’m just not.”

G: You have this uncontrolled murder…evidence scattered about…on the bottle - a murder weapon, too. 

Someone lost it, it seems. Then…you have this note. Controlled, precise…handwriting. How does that make sense? It’s a paradox. 

To me, that could mean more than one person was there during the murder, or after. Do you believe the person who wielded that bottle and killed Faith is the same person who wrote those words on a bag that was in the apartment already?

S: “We don’t have evidence to know that with certainty.”

Is there more than one person’s handwriting?

S: “I have no evidence to say that more than one person wrote it.”

Course, that’s not what I asked. One person murders Faith - another writes the note. Z did not deny that was possible.

And: “The note was written for one of the people who resided there.”

Could it have been meant for Karena Rosario? The apartment was hers.


G: Possible?

S: “Possible.”

Investigators have done numerous handwriting analyses - very likely been given some idea if the writer was, say, a man…or a woman. I asked to see the results. The request, declined.


The person(s) was unequivocally careless, no - leaving his/her handwriting? Or in fact, he/she/they were stupid. Or he/she/they were drugged up and not “all there.”

I mean, who did the writer believe would see the note? Not Faith, because she was deceased. So who was it left for? The world? Come on...

Or the scene was staged to look like something it wasn’t.

3 --

I asked about the 911 call. I have written about what I thought was suspicious/unusual/unsettling about that call. 

Here is a 1:12 clip.

Last fall, after the 20/20 piece on Faith’s case, I thought Marisol Rangel, who was interviewed for the piece…sounded - as she appeared to cry - unusually like the woman talking on the 911 call.

If it was Karena, I’ve always thought it very odd and troubling that Karena never told the 911 operator that Marisol was there with her.

Why not? Especially when the operator kept urging Karena to check Faith’s try to see if she was breathing. 

Karena seemed to move very slowly to try to do those things, or didn’t do them at all. It was hard to tell…but she didn’t seem to have urgency in checking on her.

So: why didn’t Marisol? Or did she? Why didn’t Karena say out loud, “Marisol, can you check?”

I have often thought, if it was Karena, that she didn’t call 911 the moment she first saw Faith. 

To me, the whole call reeks of unusual.


G: Do you believe Karena made that 911 call?

S: “Yes, I do.”

G: Do you believe that’s her voice on the call?

S: “Yes, I do.”
G: It sounds very much like Marisol from 20/20.

S: “Well, people often say and do unusual things when they see something horrible and shocking.”

I’ve heard hundreds of 911 calls. There are things that are “off” about this one.

And there was something the woman on the line never said that is most alarming of all. She never said Faith’s name.

I intend to post more of the 911 call sometime on the 7th.

4 --

I was able to review significant parts of some records not publicly released.

In one segment, each “page” showed some men’s faces. Different men’s faces. Men who occupied smaller circles within Faith’s larger circle. 

From her female and male friends and acquaintances. From UNC, from her hometown, from Red Robin, where she worked. And so on.

Each page, new male faces. I was looking at one-time persons of interest.

I also noted a chart detailing the locations of registered sex offenders within a variety of radii from the part of Chapel Hill where Faith and Karena resided.

That’s standard procedure. Most sex offenders have their DNA in the system, but it depends on the crime. “Lower-level” offenses or behavior may not require a sample. 

But it's is a realm where the offenses often escalate. From peeping and public exposure, among other things…to the far more serious sexual assault or attempted sexual assault.

This is where DNA testing stands right now. Again, 750 or more DNA tests done.


G: Is there anyone investigators have wanted a DNA sample from…from whom they have not been to get one?

S: “No.”

G: What does that tell you?

S: “We keep on investigating until we find a match.”

I learned police have also done DNA tests on samples from some females, too - not just men. Does that mean they think a woman may have been there during the murder?


G: Did the killer use anything other than the rum bottle and his hands…to attack Faith?

S: I’m not going to answer that question.

If there were another murder weapon, I think we’d know about it. I am surprised we know about the bottle.

5 --

I’ve learned that some individuals in the case, either themselves or their families…have retained lawyers and asked investigators to go through attorneys for questioning. 

That is not unusual…to hire an attorney if you’ve been questioned at some length - or especially more than once…and far from an automatic sign or indication of wrongdoing.

I asked whether Karena Rosario has had told investigators that she had retained an attorney. Karena…who, to my knowledge for some reason has never spoken “publicly” about her feelings about Faith, Faith’s death, the morning she said she found her, or her reactions to the murder.

Here’s what I was told: investigators contact Rosario not infrequently, and she provides replies.

But you have to ask: why do they need to keep contacting her? They have questioned her many, many times - 10 plus times…with energy and not always kid gloves.

They do believe there is more Rosario can tell them. But what?

What else can she add…unless they think she knows something about the crime - or has hidden or been deceitful about some of her own behavior?

Sounds to me like Karena Rosario has been in the crosshairs…as a key figure who knows more than she says she knows. If she wanted, she could address the speculation…talk about her interviews with police.

Is she frightened to tell the whole story? Is that why she’s been so reticent…or relucant? 

6 --

Karena says the door to the apartment was left unlocked around 4:30 a.m…when she left that Friday morning, picked up by a male friend, a UNC athlete at the time. 

That’s been known since the start.


G: Why was the door left unlocked?

S: “In college, sometimes there’s only one key and people share it.”

G: Is that what Karena has said?

S: “It’s not suspicious for college students, at one time or another, to have only one key. Leaving the door unlocked is not, on its own, suspicious.”

Safety be damned, I suppose. 

So…Faith and Karena - were comfortable there, sleeping all night, even, with the door unlocked at times? 

With patches of woods on three sides of the building. With lots of people coming and going in the parking lot and large apartment complex. 

The women were fine with the door unlocked at night?

I think college-age females are more cautious than that. On the other hand, do they leave doors unlocked sometimes? Of course they do.

But it begs the question: if there was one key, why weren’t there two keys? A copy could have been made in 15 minutes…down the road at Home Depot at Patterson Place.

Or: were the women waiting for a second key, instead of making a copy themselves, if the complex allowed it? 

Or maybe there was no key at all in either’s possession.

Still, the overnight she was murdered, Faith may have assumed Karena locked the door. Faith could easily have unclocked it on the way out the next day…before Karena returned. Right?

Or Karena may have left the door unlocked…for reasons only she knows. Was it just because she didn’t have a key?

Whatever the reason, someone walked in through an unlocked door, it seems, and murdered Faith Hedgepeth. 

How did he/they know they’d be able to just walk in? 

How did he/they know who was there..that anyone was there?

How did he/they know Karena was not there? Were he/they after her? Or Faith? 

If the two women had been there, would both have been attacked?

No, it seems the killer or killers knew only one woman was there. And if he/they knew that, it follows that he/they knew it was Faith.

It is possible it was a random man wandering door to door, looking for a young woman to attack. It happens, tragically, far too often.

Or: was it someone fixated on Faith that…she didn’t know? And he’d been watching the door.

Did this someone (or more than one person) walk into that apartment (where the stairway and door can easily be seen from the parking lot) after sunrise - and kill her? Seems unlikely. says sunrise on 9/7/2012 in Chapel Hill was 6:53 a.m. 

7 --

I asked about polygraphs:

G: Have they been used in this case?

S: “We sometimes use polygraphs in investigations to assist us, yes.”

G: But this case. Any polygraphs administered? Would I be wrong if I wrote that polygraphs have been used in Faith’s case?

S: “It is a tool we have available.”

I would lean toward yes…they have been. Giving me the answer “no” wouldn’t hurt anything if they haven’t been.

8 --

On surveiilance:

G: Has surveillance been used in this case?

S: Yes, surveillance has been used.”

G: Has there been audio surveillance? “Wiretaps” of any type?

S: “I am not going to be specific as to the types of surveillance.”

I would lean toward all types of surveillance having been utilized. That would not be surprising, and a suspect or suspects should expect that. Visual, audio, social media, other electronic communications. 

9 --

I asked about that phenotype…the image a company came up with last year from the suspect’s DNA..provided by law enforcement.

It does not account for age or body mass.

S thinks the eye color, brown/hazel…and heritage breakout - of some Latino descent - is pretty reliable. But millions of people have that eye color and heritage.

I, and many of the readers here, have seen or been sent dozens of photos of men who look like the phenotype…some with direct connections to Faith or Karena or their friends and acquaintances.

Investigators have seen most of them, if not all of them. It’s a safe bet they’ve investigated any that caught their interest.

10 --

Finally, for now: tips. S indicated there may be close to 10,000 tips in this case, of one kind or another…over the five years.

That astonishing number shows the level of interest in this case. It also shows, in my view, just how tightly held the identities of the killer and possible accomplices (before or after) have been.

They’ve said little to anyone. It’s like a vice-grip has been applied, it seems only a tiny number know the terrible truth, or even part of it.

But the one call investigators need…has not come. They are waiting for it. 

S: Yes, we believe there’s someone out there that knows something (besides the killer)…something that’s been relayed to them that can help this investigation.”

If accurate, that person (or persons) is the key, assuming the killer would never come forward on his own.

Not random. Just outside Faith’s circles.

No truth yet…about this notorious, heart-wrenching, heinous unsolved murder.

Silence from those who know. How long can that silence hold?


And no one dared
Disturb the sound of silence

Fools, said I, you do not know
Silence like a cancer grows

But my words, like silent raindrops fell
And echoed in the wells of silence.

The Sound of Silence
  • Simon & Garfunkel, 1964


Reward: $40,000. 

Crimestoppers:  919-942-7515


  1. Cynthia Mahoney.

    I agree with many of the discrepancies especially those who decline to discuss what tests were done, etc. 1. Unlocked door in a high crime area. I went to a rural college in '76 and always locked the door. My roommate and I both had keys. Smells and under-investigated. 2. Latino means a lot, could be Hispanic, however First Nation and Spanish integrated = Hispanic. Has anyone looked into a boyfriend prior to UNC? 3. Look at the facial details. Higher cheekbones and wider nose, add with the olive colored skin DNA findings this could mean native American from her tribe. 4. often a killer will attend the funeral or even participate, were any of the men/women checked for dna? 5. what happened to the dna testing on the bottle? 6. was there any evidence under her fingernails? 7. Did the CCTV outside the nightclub approximate the height of the male, or show his face? 8. She didn't feel well at the nightclub, was she tested for alcohol content or date rape drug? 9. Semen found outside of body. Maybe sexually aroused, may be red herring. Was she proven to be raped? 9. The height of the victim and the strike of the Barcardi bottle would determine, was she struck from a height, was she struck first back of head, falls, sat on and finished off with bottle? 10. Ethnicity of Brandon's roommate, the ex-con, and did the ex-con have assault history? 11. Hell hath no fury than a woman scorned (and or man). 12. Letter has no evidence of tremor/adrenaline after killing anyone. 13. What about blood traces from place of murder to kitchen or bathroom to clean up? Towel? 14. A lot of times of calls, CCTV, receipt from Time Out left out. 15. On social media and phone, any contacts from home? 16. Three ppl seem to be involved, a woman and a man. 17. Timestamp of argument would rule out the nightclub. 18. Any of her friends/roommate also know ex-con (if dna profile matches)and/or have relationship with?

  2. Excellent points mentioned in the above comment. 1. Leaving that door unlocked is a red flag, especially with the roomate's ex-boyfriend living in the same complex and the issues they had with him unlawfully entering the apartment. If the issue was the key, Rosario could have taken the key since she was the one that was going to be out that night. However she was calling Faith for a ride in the a.m. anyway so her main concern for leaving the apartment door unlocked wasn't for getting back inside the apartment. 2. I pray the police dept. Did luminol testing of the entire house. I find it very odd that vicious of a crime scene was contained to the bedroom alone. there are no trace amounts of blood anywhere else in the house, no transfer blood prints from a hand or foot.That could mean the murderer changed their clothes inside the room for no other room to not be contaminated with Faith's blood. For as violent and enraged as the person was who killed Faith, the killer(s) were very cautious and tactful as to containing the crime scene strictly to the room. It's a long shot but the whole murder seems staged so you have to think beyond the realm of the norm. Also were the dumpsters checked? Rosario left in the middle of the morning for no good reason when she was sick earlier in the club, that's why she asked faith to bring her home. She could have tossed the blood soaked clothes and went to her friends house to solidify her alibi. In a documentary I seen the other day, they said, someone told the police they noticed a red spot on Rosario's shirt when she arrived at her male friend's house when she left her apartment in the middle of the night. 3.the discrepancy over the timestamp of the voicemail she left on her friend's phone throws the case off. It brings doubt,not only because of the time but the location doesn't match up with the disturbing audio transcriptions.there's no way someone didn't hear her yelling from inside the apartment with as loud as it was and a pocket dial coming from inside of a home wouldn't have been that loud in the background. I agree it sounds like it's coming from the club. However if the audio is in fact correct and we are hearing her final moments of her murder then where exactly is the murder taking place? The downstairs neighbor only mentioned hearing thumping sounds like a heavy backpack being dropped on the floor or furniture being moved. She never mentioned screaming. Hopefully her outter circle was investigated thoroughly. After all she was majoring in medicine and biology and someone with an understanding and attention to detail to not cross contaminate things was involved in this some how. Maybe the people we suspected are cleared because it wasn't them and it was in fact someone known to her just not close to her. The sinister note could be more darker than we thought. The opening of it says it all "I'm not stupid..." after all it's been almost 6 years and the killer is still out smarting the cops.